Radiology and health care at large-must do the difficult work necessary to bring its operations into the black, or risk losing its grasp on the mission to heal.
In his 1998 novel, A Man in Full, Tom Wolfe offers up a wicked
description of a "workout artiste," a mesomorphic banking
executive with a rapier tongue who specializes in recovering losses
for the lender from delinquent debtors. Wearing suspenders printed
with a skull-and-crossbones motif, the artiste deftly disassembles
the ego, assets, and composure of the once-imposing real estate
mogul sitting before him. This is precisely the sort of fellow you
would like to see go to work on the people who were at the helm of
Enron, Tyco International, and Adelphia. This is not, however, the
sort of man you would like to see restructure the health care
system. Ours is a kinder, gentler business whose narrow margins are
due in part to the fact that a significant percentage of its
services are rendered gratis.
So it is with tongue in cheek that we refer to our cover
subjects as turnaround artistes, one a physician and the other an
executive administrator, both of whom succeeded in reviving imaging
servicesfaltering in one case and failing in the otherat their
respective institutions. Beginning on page 11, they tell their
stories. When Dr Kessler arrived at Graduate Hospital in
Philadelphia, he found an imaging department so demoralized, both
emotionally and technologically, that the hospital's own physicians
were referring outside the institution. Imaging is not a service
that hospitals can afford to lose without a fight, and that is what
Kessler and his fledgling practice proceeded to do. As for Mr
Couris, he is evidently one of imaging's master team builders, as
that is what it took to wrangle a conglomerate of four hospitals,
five imaging centers, and three radiology groups, into one smoothly
functioning imaging service, seamless across the enterprise of
Morton Plant Mease Health Care. We wish them continued success.
Looking out over a cityLos Angelesthat is struggling with its
own health care meltdown, what emerges is a quagmire of social,
economic, and political issues so impossibly tangled that they defy
solution. (Perhaps this is how our turnaround artistes felt when
they first perceived the scope of the problems at their
institutions?) Faced with a budget shortfall that prompted closure
of 11 community clinics and is expected to reach $800 million by
2005, Los Angeles County supervisors have been told by Governor
Gray Davis that he will not forward their request for yet another
federal bailout until they more seriously consider closing down
more clinics and converting two hospitals to outpatient clinics,
leaving two working county emergency departments out of a previous
five. Not incidentally, the closure of these hospitals would impact
the number of residencies available at the University of
California, Los Angeles medical school and render homeless a
research institute with a budget of $58 million annually that
currently supports close to 1,000 research projects and clinical
trials.
There are two choices when handling scarce resources: manage or
ration. We are inches away from rationing care here in Los Angeles.
As federal, county, and state officials continue to sidestep the
issues of the uninsured, the administrators of these and other
institutions like them do the best they can to keep the boat
afloat. Managing and administrating radiologyand health care in
generaldoes not command the huge bonuses and salaries that are
evident in the corporate world. Indeed, the personal rewards are
smaller, and the challenges and responsibilities greater. I
encourage you to contact me with your own stories and best
practices, so they can be shared with the readers of Decisions in
Imaging Economics.
Cheryl Proval
cproval@medpubs.com