A Q & A session with Willi Kalender, PhD, on the benefits and future of multidetector CT.
Will Kalender, PhD
|
Willi Kalender, PhD, is professor, Institute of Medical
Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Q: What are the clinical benefits of 16-slice CT technology?
Kalender: Examination times are reduced to such an extent that
compromises in parameter selection are no longer required. Most
important, one can have submillimeter isotropic resolution for all
anatomic regions in a very short timeless than the duration of a
breath hold.
Q: How will these scanners change the practice of radiology?
Kalender: There have been reports of faster patient throughput,
but that is not the important difference. What goes up is, above
all, the quality of the examination. Top performance is provided
routinely.
Q: Will the larger number of slices and the greater (even,
perhaps, overwhelming) amount of information generated by
multislice CT increase the acceptance of three-dimensional
displays?
Kalender: Definitely, yes; film is out, and interactive reading
of volumes is in.
Q: Do the benefits justify the cost of upgrading to 16-slice
CT?
Kalender: The increase in benefit becomes more and more marginal
as the number of slices goes up, but the 16-slice machines are, to
a high degree, perfect.
Q: What will radiologists be able to do when CT technology moves
beyond 16 slices to 32, 64, or more?
Kalender: Only few additional applications will become available
when CT goes to more than 16 slices. One example would be perfusion
of the heart. Scanners that capture more than 16 slices would also
be of interest for higher and higher resolution. The greater number
of slices, however, will imply significantly higher radiation doses
for a given level of soft-tissue discrimination, which will be
prohibitive.
Judith Gunn Bronson, MS, is a contributing writer for Decisions in Imaging Economics.