Search       
 

About IE
Contact Us
Subscribe
Read Weekly eNewsletter
HOME | NEWS | CURRENT ISSUE | BUYER'S GUIDE | ARCHIVES | CALENDAR | RESOURCES | CAREERS

Viewpoint


Issue: June 2003
Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor

The Tale of the Tortoise

by Cheryl Proval

The efforts of the many individuals who brought radiology into the digital age are to be commended, but more work lies ahead.

Are silicon and Ethernet the answer to medical error and personnel shortages?

Medical informatics are being touted as the potential cure for some very high- profile health care problems, and, yes, it would be nice if it were that simple. But those in radiology know, more so than those in any other clinical department, that information technology is just partalbeit a necessary partof the cure. We have watched the resources and attention of the information technology department shift from one "urgent" informatics initiative to the nextfrom Y2K to EMR to CPOE and now back to the EMRduring the past 5 years. While that department races to achieve the big win, radiology, like Aesop's proverbial tortoise, has slowly and systematically made real and measurable progress toward achieving some very specific communications and operational goals: first, in converting the department to a digital environment and, second, in providing referrers access to the digital files containing the requisite diagnostic information. In a growing number of institutions, radiology has been the springboard from which enterprise-wide communication efforts are being launched via Internet technologies such as web browsers, portals, and Wi-Fi. These advances, it should be stated, would not have been possible without the assistance of information technology department personnel. Many individuals in the medical and vendor communities have spent years and invested millions to make this revolution in radiological communications happen. You know who you are, so give yourselves a round of applause, you deserve it. But there is more to be done. Computerized physician order entry for radiology could provide much-needed decision support and utilization management. Bringing structure to the reporting process would potentially save precious time and provide radiology and medicine at large with access to a mother lode of diagnostic data for research purposes. And, last but not least, by embracing and adopting industry-wide standards for the seamless communication among the multitude of devices, applications, and systems in the radiology department, radiology will build a bridge to the enterprise that accommodates two-way traffic.

For those in radiology who are planning to put information technology to the service of their departmental missions, here are a few guidelines culled from the experiences of the many contributors to this edition of Decisions in Imaging Economics, dedicated to imaging informatics:

1. Know what you want to accomplish. Technology is an enabling tool to get where you need to go.

2. Educate yourself. You cannot write an RFP if you do not know what is possible. A good place to begin is A Nontechnical Introduction to DICOM on the Web site of the Radiological Society of North America, written by PACS pioneer Steven Horii, MD. This will provide a basic understanding of one of the most important building blocks in medical communications. It can be accessed at: http://www.rsna.org

The next stop is the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise technical framework also posted on the RSNA Web site: http://www.rsna.org. By understanding the work of this organization, buyers can influence the adoption rate of vendors.

3. Allocate the necessary personnel resources. More than one PACS project has floundered because the sponsors failed to initiate the proper planning and to designate an experienced and/or passionate person to the endeavor. This is hard work and it requires the efforts of many people. With resources stretched as thin as they are in most organizations, there must be one person with the vision and mission to see each project through to its conclusion.

The flashy, top-down informatics projects promoted by the dream weavers and vaporware vendors are tantalizing, but at the moment they are little more than science fiction. It is the bottom-up projects rooted in clinical reality and based on industry-wide standards that are adding real value to the health care enterprise.

Cheryl Proval

cproval@medpubs.com


Related Articles - Viewpoint

Form Follows Function - February 2004

The Sky Is Falling! - December 2003

What is Quality - November 2003

A Standoff - October 2003

Retail Radiology: DOA? - September 2003

Displaying 5 of 41 related articles. View all related articles.


Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor
Resources
Media Kit
Editorial Advisory Board
Advertiser Index
Reprints
News | Current Issue | Buyer's Guide | Archives | Calendar | Resources | Careers
About IE | Contact Us | Subscribe | Read Weekly eNewsletter
Media Kit | Editorial Advisory Board | Advertiser Index | Reprints
Allied Healthcare
24X7 |  Chiropractic Products Magazine |  Clinical Lab Products (CLP) |  Orthodontic Products |  The Hearing Review
Hearing Products Report (HPR) |  HME Today |  Rehab Management |  Physical Therapy Products |  Plastic Surgery Products
Imaging Economics |  Medical Imaging |  RT |  Sleep Review
Medical Education
SynerMed Communications |  IMED Communications
Practice Growth
Practice Builders
Copyright © 2008 Ascend Media LLC | IMAGING ECONOMICS | All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service