by Michael J. Gray
Efforts to promote connectivity among various radiology information subsystems and preserve the integrity of the data may be stymied in part by the vendors survival instincts.
Have you ever noticed how the most interesting features or
subjects we see and hear about at the annual meeting of the
Radiological Society of North America are rarely available at that
time and, sometimes, not even a year later? This observation seems
especially true for picture archiving and communications systems
(PACS) developments.
Shortly after every RSNA, the brightest and best from the PACS
companies head back to volunteer duty on various DICOM and
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) planning committees. By
April/May of each year, the IHE committees have made their
suggested changes or additions to the DICOM standard that will
enable specific attributes to work in the real world. Even before
the latest changes are ratified, the vendors' engineers are busy
trying to determine which of the new DICOM elements merit inclusion
in their own product development schedules.
Making that determination requires a somewhat public discussion
about the effects that those changes will or will not have on their
current PACS product. Not surprisingly, some of those discussion
points find their way into Requests For Proposal (RFP) documents or
the corresponding RFP responses. Not surprisingly, some of those
points find their way into competitive sales presentations. And
that is how the rest of us come to hear about new features that
will not become available for a year or more.
The latest acronyms added to the DICOM lexicon are GSPS and KON.
They were already buzzwords by Sunday afternoon of the 2002 RSNA
meeting, though few of the vendors had incorporated them into their
product development schedules. Greyscale Softcopy Presentation
State (GSPS) is a DICOM service-object pair (SOP) class that allows
the preservation and transfer of the way that images are presented
on the various types of displays throughout the system.
Window/level settings and image overlays created by the radiologist
on the diagnostic display can be preserved and transferred to the
web viewer station in front of the referring physician. Key Object
Notes (KON), actually a specialized form of DICOM Structured
Reporting, is a DICOM SOP class that allows the radiologist to mark
key images and attach a brief text note to the collection. Both of
these tools would greatly assist a referring physician in wading
through a 750-slice CT study. GSPS and KON greatly enhance the
utility of a PACS, and it would be desirable to have both of these
features. If the two features are provided via DICOM, the
availability is even more significant, because that would make it
possible to transfer changes in GSPS and KON between PACS
subsystems provided by different vendors, representing the holy
grail of connectivity between PACS systems.
A HOT TOPIC
Since a growing number of imaging departments, as well as
multi-department health systems, find themselves having to
integrate legacy PACS, teleradiology, and web server subsystems
into coherent systems, DICOM support of GSPS and KON is suddenly a
very hot topic. Even for an imaging department starting from
scratch, support for these two latest DICOM SOP classes is a must,
because they are an absolute prerequisite for a multi-vendor
system. The mere possibility of integrating the diagnostic display
subsystem from one vendor with the archive subsystem from another
vendor, and maybe the web server subsystem from a third vendor, is
the surest way to achieve the best price/performance
package&even if the eventual system ends up coming from a
single vendor.
So why are these two SOP classes missing from so many PACS
solutions this year? The DICOM and IHE efforts are not out of sync
with the vendor's development schedules. Indeed, the standards
effort appears to have become an integral part of a vendor's
product development cycle. So what is the delay?
While many PACS vendors support GSPS-like and KON-like features
in their PACS, the features are not based on DICOM. In many
systems, data elements such as window/level, overlay, and key image
markers are stored in the vendor's PACS Directory Database, not
with the image in the Image Database. As such, they cannot be
transferred to the other vendor's system using DICOM operations.
Some vendors store these data elements in proprietary fields of
their DICOM image header. In these cases, they might be transferred
with the image to another vendor's system, but, without a "magic
decoder ring," the data elements are not recognized by the
receiving system and therefore cannot be utilized.
Unfortunately, the support of the DICOM SOP classes for GSPS and
KON in many of the current PACS offerings is going to take some
time. Perhaps "DICOM-izing" these operations goes to the heart of
how these systems create and manage the data elements, and it takes
time to reinvent that wheel. There may be as much competitive
pressure resisting open system connectivity as there is for
embracing that connectivity.
At this point in time, the potential buyer of any new PACS
component needs to understand all of the various connectivity
issues before making that purchase. It is important to understand
how all of the data elements are managed and moved throughout the
system and its subsystems. It is important to understand what
subsystem can and cannot be connected to another vendor's
subsystem. After all, it is your data, and years from now you are
the one responsible for being able to access it&all of it.
Michael J. Gray is president, Gray Consulting, Novato, Calif, graycons@well.com.