Imaging department renovations challenge owners and designers to manage costs, time, and future flexibility
Relocating an imaging suite could limit the transport time for extremely ill patients, but may increase shielding requirements
|
The competitive health care market continually is challenging
facility owners and managers to upgrade, expand, and renovate their
facilities to provide state-of-the-art medicine. Imaging departments tend to experience change most
frequently because of constantly changing technologies and the
potential for increased revenues from increased capacity.
Institutions cannot build new facilities each time they change out
technology, so the obvious choice is to renovate and retool
existing spaces as efficiently as possible. Interior hospital
renovation projects, particularly for imaging departments, demand a
knowledgeable and senior design team that knows how to approach the
project to help the owner obtain multiple returns with the same
investment. The design team can help the owner manage costs, time,
and future flexibility.
Renovating existing space to accommodate new imaging equipment
can be quite complicated, especially if the building is old and has
experienced multiple renovations. While each renovation project is
different, owners should be aware of five strategic planning
techniques that are essential for a successful and cost-effective
imaging-department renovation.
Begin With Flexibility
Creating a patient-friendly environment in rooms containing high technology can be acheived through lighting, color, temperature and room size
|
It is critically important when planning a diagnostic imaging
department, or even an individual imaging suite within a larger
department, to recognize that technology will change, perhaps
before the project is even completed. It is imperative to ensure
that the design provides some level of flexibility to accommodate
inevitable change. Flexibility in planning includes a clear zoning
of diagnostic suites, equipment support, and staff support spaces
within the department, as well as some generic design
considerations within the actual imaging room. To acquire the
latest technology possible, owners may delay the selection of an
equipment vendor until later in the project when the renovation is
well under way. The design obviously cannot wait until then to be
completed. One approach is for the finished project to accommodate
more than one equipment manufacturer's equipment. This slightly
generic approach can provide the owner with flexibility in
negotiating the purchase of equipment.
"The equipment becomes obsolete before the room," says Richard
Sprow, AIA, associate principal, Perkins & Will, New York.
"Whenever possible, we avoid designing a room specifically to
accommodate only one equipment vendor's machine, and we try to
never build the minimum-size room. We have frequent, detailed
communications with vendors and their design staff to coordinate
our design. We design floors, walls, ceilings, and lighting to
accommodate varying equipment needs, such as lead and copper
shielding, support structures, steel reinforcement, bored holes in
concrete slabs, lighting, and various electrical services."
Designs that are customized to one particular vendor's piece of
equipment have to be altered if the equipment changes, which can
result in increased costs to the owner and schedule delays. Newer
equipment may offer improved capabilities or efficiencies, but at
the same time may have different requirements of the physical
space. They may be heavier, requiring increased structural
capacity; they may generate more heat, which would necessitate
additional cooling; they may draw more electrical power, requiring
electrical upgrades; they may require additional shielding or
acoustical and vibration isolation; and they may just be larger,
requiring more space either in the room, or to get the equipment
into the room. All these seemingly invisible equipment changes have
impacts on the design of the space.
For MRIs in particular, there are significant requirementsand
limitationsfor design. For instance, within the actual magnet room
there can be no ferrous metal on building materials, fixtures, and
especially mobile equipment. The magnetic field is so strong that
metal objects can become projectiles within the room, resulting in
injury and significant damage to the room and equipment. All
nonferrous metal or "MRI-compliant" materials must be used for
items like stretchers, IV poles, mobile carts, and medical
equipment. To effectively screen for metal items that enter the
room accidentally via staff or patients, some institutions elect to
install a metal detector at the door to catch any metal objects
before they enter the MRI suite.
Efficiency in Planning
Managing operating costs is of prime concern to hospital
administrators, and new projects should be planned so as not to
require any additional FTEs to operate effectively. Imaging
departments can be designed for improved efficiencies while still
increasing the department's capacity and therefore revenue.
Whenever possible, imaging technologies should be grouped so they
can share common support spaces such as equipment rooms, mechanical
and electrical support, technician control areas, physician reading
rooms, consultation rooms, and storage. Common work and support
spaces can result in improved communication, coordination, and
productivity within the department. A central support "core'
wrapped by imaging suites may require fewer technicians to staff as
well as less space than if each imaging suite had its own dedicated
support spaces. Cross-trained imaging technicians can increase
productivity further and reduce staffing needs. A central support
space also allows for more isolated renovation and equipment
upgrades of suites situated along the perimeter while operations
are maintained in the rest of the department. The support spaces
remain to serve the new imaging equipment.
Situating diagnostic and therapeutic imaging modalities close to
other invasive procedures such as surgery has the advantages of
consolidating highly specialized services, as well as minimizing
transports between these services for acutely ill patients.
New York Presbyterian Hospital wanted to situate an MRI suite
and a CT scanner adjacent to a neuroscience intensive care unit to
adjust to today's requirements for frequent patient imaging.
Bringing inpatient and outpatient imaging departments closer to
surgical services also facilitates procedures in which "remote
control" via imaging is part of the treatment itself, allowing
procedures to be less invasive and performed in smaller spaces.
This also requires less moving of critically ill patients: the
technology can move to the patient versus the traditional method of
transporting the patient to the technology.
"More and more, the imaging and surgery are taking place
simultaneously, blurring the line between the two procedures," says
Susan Niculescu, PhD, AIA, associate principal, Perkins & Will.
"Although cardiology, radiology, and surgery are still separate
departments, they frequently use the same equipment and need
similar support spaces. For example, cardiac catheterization uses
the same equipment as angiography."
Planning for the Long-Term
While nearly all imaging modalities have special physical
requirements to either contain, control, or absorb energy from the
imaging source, some imaging technologies, such as MRI magnets,
have rigorous siting requirements due to the internal physical
properties of the modality. These requirements not only specify the
proximity to occupied areas, but also dictate the materials and
objects that can be situated around the magnet. The space becomes
highly specialized, so long-term planning is critical to future
flexibility in and around the imaging suite.
Vibrations created in the building and proximity to large
quantities of steel or large steel objects, such as cars or
elevator cabs, can affect the functioning of the equipment. Magnets
should not be situated near existing or future elevator shafts.
Older buildings require a structural study to determine whether the
floor needs additional support, or if there is old steel concealed
and forgotten for years that may be in the environment. New
structural steel has to be sized carefully and situated in order to
avoid becoming magnetized and further impacting the operation of
the magnet. In some cases, more magnetic shielding, in the form of
heavy steel plates, is needed to contain the magnetic field within
a safe area.
The placement of equipment must take into account how the
equipment will be delivered to the actual room, including the
doorway to the outside as well as the travel route within the
building. When it is not possible to situate equipment along the
exterior wall of the building and it has to be situated internally,
careful consideration must be given to the transport route within
the facility. Some imaging equipment is delivered to the site
assembled in large pieces, which have to be transported carefully
through the facility's corridors and doorways and put in place on
whatever floor the department is situated. For these large,
heavy-equipment items, such as magnets, the travel route through
the building has to be studied carefully to accommodate the size of
the equipment as well as support it. Sometimes, supports have to be
added below the corridor floor to ensure the equipment is supported
along its transport route. Also, designers sometimes provide space,
such as a hatch in the roof, for future replacement of
equipment.
Another consideration is the technology itself. For example, the
all-around Gauss field of the imaging equipment itself, once it is
operational, affects other technologies in nearby departments. In
some cases, the equipment has to be shielded above and below. For
one New York Presbyterian MRI suite renovation, situated between a
surgical department above and a cardiology department below, the
designers had to strengthen the floor and shield the MRI equipment
with special solid-steel sheets in addition to the copper and lead
shielding already in place.
ReValidating Existing Conditions
Particularly when renovating imaging departments, it is
important to revalidate the actual existing conditions once
selective demotion has been completed, especially in older
buildings. While record drawings may be available to document
previous renovations, in very old buildings, these records may not
be available to provide some guidance as to existing conditions.
Even when drawings are available showing previous reconstruction
work, the precise locations of objects hidden behind walls, above
ceilings, and below floors may be dramatically different than
originally intended. Much of the cost of renovation projects
depends on knowing precisely where things are and what it costs to
interface with them. During renovation projects, costs can escalate
dramatically with these "unforeseen conditions." Traditionally on
renovation projects, the contractor performs the required
demolition, and if there are any unforeseen conditions or
conflicts, the designers are alerted via a Request for Information.
The designers study the situation, possibly visit the site, and
provide a solution back to the contractor. The contractor reviews
the situation and may have more questions before reaching a
solution. This process can take considerable time, and may cause
project delays and cost increases.
To be more proactive and minimize the impacts of unforeseen
conditions, it can be very useful to have the architects and
engineers, along with the contractor, perform a postdemolition
revalidation of the design. Once substantial demolition is
complete, the design team, including the respective subcontractors,
can inspect the demolition site in order to see the raw, exposed
spaces and measure, inspect, and validate that the design works
within the space. Seeing the exposed spaces allows the design team
to uncover any unforeseen conditions or conflicts immediately so
they can begin to resolve them and/or adjust the design. Having the
contractor present during this postdemolition site inspection
allows the designers and builders to collaborate on how to resolve
conflicts immediately. It is essential to double-check that all
plans will work, especially in older facilities where the dimension
requirements can be as tight as just a few inches.
Patient-Friendly Environments
Like many aspects of today's modern health care, imaging
environments still can appear intimidating to patients. For as long
as this technology has been around, architects and designers have
been seeking ways to make these high-technology environments feel
less imposing, warmer, and more comforting. The challenge continues
to lie in the physical limitations imposed by some imaging
technologies.
Various design innovations have been implemented successfully to
improve the appearance and character of the imaging environment.
Situating equipment in larger rooms may make the technology seem
smaller. Temperature should be controlled in each room. Using soft
lighting to highlight artwork or murals on walls and ceilings is a
technique used to suggest openness and the idea of windows and
skylights. Architectural coves with indirect lighting, warm-colored
materials, and textures help to humanize the environment. Small
changes that seem merely aesthetic can have a huge impact on the
space. Sound systems can be designed to allow for customization to
the individual patient's music selection. With the right lighting
and design, even a windowless environment can be made to feel
welcoming and foster a feeling of wellness.
When owners, managers, architects, and designers agree on the
key strategies outlined above, the results drive higher revenues
and lower costs in imaging department renovations.
Chris Bormann, AIA, Perkins & Will, New York City, can be reached at chris.bormann@perkinswill.com.